Archive | glbt RSS feed for this section

And The Living is Easy

10 Jul

Update: On a related note, I wrote Preparations for a Chinese Wedding five years ago.

Weddings, funerals and fortune tellers depress me.

Weddings, I’ve been known to say, make me linger too long on the idea of happiness. Not that it’s ever been bleak on the romantic front. The wedding type of happy simply seems worlds apart from the love type of happy to me, but then I was the odd one out in too many ways. I was that strange little girl who distressed, not too silently, over the idea that any impending happiness had to come from a Prince Charming, a white dress, a ring, or a HDB flat. I squinted hard in the horizon and tried to see some kind of prince heading my way. I made mental concessions, I had to. “If this prince has long hair, a beautiful face, and soft hands to hold,” I often wondered aloud, “then I guess it’s okay.” Maybe that’s why I didn’t have too many friends in primary school. I like the idea of marriage. But weddings, and ceremonies or rituals of any sort that spell out the rules of what can’t be done more than what can, just depress me. Gay people usually feel we have to work twice as hard in everything: to excel at sports even though you’re a faggot, to make it at the workplace even though you’re a dyke, to be happy even though you’re a sad homosexual. And now I have to work twice as hard to fly somewhere else, book a vineyard, buy two dresses, find the right girl, and fly everyone there and know not everyone I love will be happy for me? I don’t know. I don’t know how that compares to cold jellyfish, PowerPoint slides, sharks’ fin, yum sengs and bad singing from the groom. Maybe happiness doesn’t need other people’s approving — or disapproving — looks.

Funerals are something else altogether. Losing a loved one is a terrible thing and, I’ve been told, doesn’t get any better with practice. There is nothing pleasant about a funeral. Grief and loss is the sum total of the pain of heartbreak and disappointment, magnified. They remind us of our own mortality, the things not yet done, the things we will never do. Aspirations, ambition, dashed dreams, lost loves, happiness, the abruptness of death, what little time you have left and what you still need to do. Death makes every obstacle in life seem ridiculously small in comparison. My grandfather died a few days before Michael Jackson. It destroyed me. My ex is getting married in three countries to the same person, just a few months after my niece was born and a few days after one of my good friends gave birth. It’s supposed to be revitalizing. I find this all chilling. Exciting, eventful, but some days I crave normalcy. Yet I’m finding, rather late into young adulthood, that everything we did in English Literature class — love, loss, death, other such milestones and the cycles of life — are not overwritten cliches. How Rosencrantz and Guildenstern, in Stoppard’s version, spent all their lives trying to find out their destiny only to be ultimately disappointed; trapped within the wheels of pre-determination?

And those high priests of pre-determination, fortune tellers. They are to most people, beacons of light. For the less superstitious like myself, they disappoint me greatly even if they have only good things to say. That’s it? That’s life? That’s all love is about? How the hell do you know this anyway? I’ve been to quite a few from Singapore to Dhaka to Antalya and Istanbul, just out of curiosity, and I’ve come to the conclusion that maybe I just don’t want to know. Maybe all I want is to fumble my way through life attending as few funerals as I can. Travel even more. Give up smoking. Drink as much good wine and spirits as I can, not at the same time. Be a good person. Send my parents on nice vacations every now and then. Give my best in everything I do. Love bravely, truthfully, fiercely and without fear; not of anybody else, not of each other. Be loved in equal amounts. Have a long distance relationship only once, but make it count. Give to charity. Be kind to cats. Live in as many cities as I can. Turn 24 in three months time but not 10 000 kilometres away from the person I love, ever again.

Maybe even learn to be more optimistic about weddings if I expect to still have friends in my middle age. Or do a better job of pretending.

Possibly the Most Difficult Post I Have Ever Written

28 Apr

With the AWARE EOGM (that’s too many acronyms, even for Singapore — the Association of Women for Action and Research’s Extraordinary General Meeting) a few days away, let me use this platform to share my experience as a young Singaporean woman who 1. is actively Christian 2. attended Christian schools 3. is more than ‘a little interested’ in civil society and local politics.

Notice I don’t say 4. as a gay woman, because what I am about to say would still hold true even if I wasn’t.

I seldom discuss religion here and this may surprise many, but I grew up in a Christian home. My family is moderately religious. We are all involved in church to some extent. I attended Christian schools for 8 out of 12 years of formal education. We had compulsory chapel and morning prayers (waived if you were Muslim). We sometimes host prayer meetings at our house and when we don’t, we attend them once a week somewhere in the neighbourhood. I do this out of my own free will and personal conviction. I was not forced into this religion. Like every Christian my walk with God has wavered, particularly through the murky periods of late adolescence, but I have found peace and renewed faith. My return to the religion, after a period away, was a happy one. My family can be considered religious but they are also some of the most wonderful, non-judgmental people I know. We — and the church we attend — have a problem with the idea of ‘religion’, and see the idea of ‘religion’ as a trap that distracts from what Christianity is about, i.e. our personal relationships with God.

All through the Christian schools I attended, we had prayers every morning followed by a short sermon. This, I can safely say, nobody minded. We always had a handful of teachers who were ‘religious’. They never once crossed the boundaries of our secular nation, only sharing the Word when asked, and never in an offensively evangelical manner. In these people, I — and other students, including many non-Christians — found tender, unjudging voices to turn to in our times of need. Occasionally non-Christian students would even ask for a prayer, out of class hours, and I saw for myself how these people unconditionally provided love, care, and guidance.

‘Sex education’ in my school days was still teethering on the brink ‘don’t ask, don’t tell’. In our Anglican school the official line was that we should not have sex. By the time we talked about it we were 18. Half the people I knew in junior college were already sexually active. A good handful of us, and I think the teachers knew this too, identified as ‘homosexual’. Being fairly bright people, my schoolmates, I think most of us knew what to do. Condoms, et al. I even remember holding court with some girls once — we were trying to figure out what ’safe lesbian sex’ meant (condoms on toys, and water-based… stuff, if any). We were lucky. We had the internet. We then had one or two Civic Education lessons in which we filled in a ‘test’, and just about everybody found the questions silly and stupid for they toed the official line: that sex in any form should not be had before marriage, and it was to be abstinence all the way. There was uproarious laughter. We filled in the ‘right’ answers anyway so that we could go out and watch the football.

I never once watched a ‘lesbian-themed’ movie. There wasn’t “the L Word” or “Spider Lilies” back in the day. The first time I ever saw a ‘lesbian-themed’ anything was when I was 14 and I went to watch the Taiwanese movie “Tempting Hearts” with my first boyfriend (yes, I’m getting to that in a bit). I identified wholly with the falling for your best friend thing but could not, at that point, imagine being with one. I promptly forgot about it and went back to holding hands with the boy. Years later, another gay girl in junior college downloaded a Swedish movie called “F*cking Amal” (go Kazaa!!) and we watched it together. There were no subtitles. It was about two young Swedish girls who had fallen in love with each other. We didn’t make out after watching it. I highly doubt that I would have been prompted to think “I should try being gay” if I had gone to see “Spider Lilies” in a movie screening at the time. Most likely, as movie screenings go, I would have read the synopsis and known of the plot and I would have chosen to go.

(I know this is taking a while to get to what I’m trying to say, but be patient.)

Of my friends in school who are now openly gay — male or female — we had a tacit knowledge of each other’s sexualities. The only thing we had was each other, and furious searches on the internet. If nobody taught us that being gay is “OK”, how did we come around to that? I think we got pretty lucky because we had each other. There are plenty of young gay people who never come around to realising that they are not alone. Some even attempt suicide: from taunting, from furious questions about ourselves, from “what the fuck is wrong with me?”. Some succeed.

These are things that you cannot wish away. These are things that you cannot close an eye and say “they do not exist”. These are things that are real that some people pretend don’t exist, but the only thing they ever come close to establishing is that “this should not be”.

So what did 8 years in Christian schools do for us as young gay people? For the most part, it was a non-issue. The Higher Ups tacitly knew that we existed and that this is what we were, but they had no grounds for intervention: most of our relationships were off-campus, not with each other, and in our own time. We were well-balanced individuals. We didn’t go running off to toilets to make out with each other, the same way you don’t expect your average straight couple in school to do that. The only time it was ever an issue was when I went through a year-long period of turmoil — with myself, my sexuality, my head, my family, my schooling. I was a wreck and everybody knew it. I fell behind in my grades and instead of busying myself with scholarship and Ivy League university applications, I was sorting out my head and a heartbreak. I wrote an angsty email to a teacher and explained that I was having difficulties reconciling with my sexuality and that I needed time to get over a particularly wrecking relationship. She said: “OK. Let me know if you need to talk.” I got over it. Nobody ever said it’s okay to be gay. Nobody ever said it was wrong either. It helped.

Seven years on, I think I’ve finally reached a certain equilibrium and that has nothing to do with being gay, and everything to do with being a young adult, unsure and insecure about the future. From running this blog I know many young people are struggling with it too — I get several emails a week from it. And I think I may have unwittingly become some sort of figurehead that these young people look up to that you don’t have to be miserable — you can be quite fulfilled, accomplished, and you can have happy relationships. If people see that I’m a fairly well-balanced individual with some semblance of sanity, career and accomplishment, then so be it. There are many more like me out there. They include people in every sector of society. They are your brothers and sisters. They are your cousins. They are your classmates and they are the weird boys who sat around struggling to find the appropriate response to the collective ‘ogling at nude women’ activity that goes in our boys’ schools. They are girls like me who didn’t know what to say when they found themselves surrounded by swooning girls, swooning over some hot jock. Like them, I don’t actively go out and spread the message. I’m only doing what I know best: being myself. And I am happy to be not miserable, to lead a fulfilling life concentrating on all these other things that make up who I am. Things that have nothing to do with the fact that I am gay.

I am this way because I have been since I was four. I only “came of age” was a gay person at 17, when I dumped my boyfriends and decided to be true to myself. At no point in my life did anybody tell me “this is OK”. I simply figured it out for myself. For the most part, I think my friends and family, even the Christians among them, have never once treated me differently because of who I date (a very smart and beautiful girl, if I can say so myself). None of my friends treat this as a big deal. It is as negligible as the fact that I am Chinese and that I travel a ton — as negligible as the fact that I write and photograph for a living. They mostly find the other parts of me a lot more interesting: things like where I’m going next week, when I’m going to be back home, things like how I can possibly afford to travel as much as I do, and the latest gossip about our friends :P

I consider myself lucky to be surrounded by people like these. People who, regardless of their cultural backgrounds and political leanings, are very much accepting of others. This is important in a society like ours, one that is multi-racial, multi-cultural, multi-lingual, multi-everything. The Christian schools I went to accepted that. The Christians I live with and worship with accept that. My very Christian father is a big fan of AWARE and aspired that I might one day be president. My very Christian father is a big fan of a certain lawyer who once hosted a certain talkshow (and known lesbian and playwright) and used to sit me in front of the telly to ask me to learn from her, her skill, grace, eloquence, and most importantly her ’strength’ as a woman. I consider myself very lucky to have a father like that.

The fine line that I think is the breaking point in present day Christianity is the efforts of a few trying to split the religion by emphasizing overtly on just one topic: what other people are doing in bed. Brought up as a Christian child the most important lessons I ever took home from church were that we should strive to be Christ-like in all things, and that God loves us. Those of you who don’t know me here might jump on this as the chance to say if you want to be Christ-like, shouldn’t you not be homosexual? To this I only say this is my own cross to bear, and I myself am admissible to God in all things — just as you are. And that coming from a very Christian home (that works, is very well put together, and more functional than most families), I am surrounded by people in happy marriages who are good fathers and mothers, including my own very Christian brother. I don’t know if they see it yet, but I do not see my relationship to be any different from any of theirs. We have the same relationship milestones and the same struggles and triumphs. We are well-balanced individuals committed to our careers, and to each other. That includes everything you would expect of a committed relationship, including what we are going to do in the next year, five, or ten. One day they will have to come around to seeing that my choice of the person I want to grow old with is the best one, and that any other option (male, or another female) is not even up for questioning. (But then they read this blog… so…)

The Scriptures make mention of many issues: unbelievers, menstruating women, idols, other religions, theft, robbery, adultery. And occasionally, homosexuality (although if you read some leading Bible scholars on the topic they might tell you that the word used does not translate accurately to “homosexuals”, but rather to male prostitution). But I’m not here to argue Scripture. As a Christian I believe the Word is final. As a Christian I also believe that you are all entitled to your own interpretations of what it means, because if we didn’t have disagreement we wouldn’t have so many disparate schools of Christianity. There are some among us who believe that we should not marry unbelievers because we should “not be yoked with unbelievers”. There are some among us who believe wholly that women have to submit to their husbands. There are some among us who believe that all non-believers will go to hell. I think we all unequivocally, Christian or not, believe that adultery is not right. There is no joy in any of this debate. This debate distracts from the joy that is the worship of God.

But who are these modern day Crusaders, and who are they to say they have the last word on how other people should or should not live? Why take issue with just homosexuality? Isn’t divorce, adultery and pregnancy out of wedlock more startling issues for the family? Why focus just on this one topic? What is your stand on that, and what organisations are you starting to deal with these issues (other than the heinously evil Focus on the Family)?

Singapore, as a society, has made considerable progress. There was a time when interracial marriages were spoken of as the unthinkable, and now it is considered backward to do so. Despite all that, there is still outspoken opposition from some quarters to the idea of we can marry out of our race. But it is now fairly commonplace to stroll down Orchard Road and see the most unlikely combinations in dating couples, happily walking hand in hand. I grew up in a time where “family” isn’t always clear-cut, and I am happy that is so. I have friends of all races in many countries across the world. I have friends who are straight, gay, and transgendered. I have friends who are happily married — through arranged marriages. I have friends who are never going to marry. I love them for who they are.

Fresh from visiting the amazing Crusader’s castle (Qalat al’Hosn, or Kraks des Chevaliers) in Syria, I am reminded of one simple fact: as a religion our best bet, history has shown, is to do what we do best. Be Christ-like and to love. Not brandish swords and stir up hatred among people who don’t believe in the same things we do. I expect many readers to take issues with my sudden profession of faith and sexuality. Fine. But we would all do well to hold tightly to let he who has no sin cast the first stone. Because this culture war is underway, and religion should have nothing to do with it. That is my right, and yours, as a citizen of this secular nation. And I wouldn’t have it any other way.

Stop the AWARE Hijacking

22 Apr

Dear Popagandhi.com readers, you have all been good to me over the years. You already know my stand on certain things, namely feminism, sexuality, and Being Singaporean. Despite all that, I never cared much for activism either. I’d dipped my toes into those murky waters very briefly in my younger days, and never cared to go back into it.

It’s about to change.

AWARE (Association of Women for Action and Research) has been the foremost voice for women in my country, Singapore. Despite its shortcomings (and there are many), we have always been able to count on it for one thing: it was non-partisan. It spoke for all women, regardless of religion, sexuality or race. That’s especially important in a country like ours that lacks a culture of civil participation.

Although I am now many miles away travelling the Middle East (Beirut, if you must know), I am deeply concerned by the recent hijack of the organization’s leadership by what we believe to be fundamentalist Christians.

Yes, AWARE’s constitution was lacking, and its leadership perhaps too complacent in not being able to prevent such a thing. Yes, that sort of thing can happen. And maybe AWARE does need new blood. Whatever the case is, the facts are there and it’s up to you to decide. The circumstances in which the new leadership gained power were more than suspect — most of its members were new, and the new committee, beyond being more unproven in civil society, were complete strangers whose only claims to fame were militantly homophobic letters to the national press, and a shared membership in a certain actively homophobic church (which, if you must know, is Church of Our Saviour — the one that once audaciously hung the dastardly “Gay But Not Happy?” banners on their grounds along the MRT).

I don’t care what you think about homosexuals or about homosexuality. But I think we can all agree that an organization who speaks for all Singaporean women would suffer under such a leadership. The noted playwright Ovidia Yu mentions in her blog that “At least two people mentioned receiving emails warning them that to protect their daughters from the lesbian influences they should join Aware & and help vote out the old committee”. My personal sources within the NGO movement have enough grounds to fear that the organization, under such a leadership, will actively seek to overturn any progress we have made as a society for our women — in particular on sexuality and reproductive rights.

One important note. AWARE is not, by any stretch of imagination, a campaigner of gay rights. They have never once stood up for lesbian or bisexual women. (See this for more background reading.) We are interested because if you have been around Singapore often enough you will know that the militancy of the fundamental Christian right has, in recent years, been shockingly antagonistic, not only towards gay people, but towards anyone who didn’t fit their ideology. And that is dangerous. (Note: if you want to quibble on religion, forget it — I have been and am Christian all my life. And the Christians I grew up around are nowhere like this bunch. Anyone with a problem with my sexuality and my religion would do well to read their own Bible, short of telling me to read mine.) You need to be concerned with this if you believe, like I do, that our NGOs and bodies of governance need to be secular. And that if they are not, they need to explicitly state who they are, and what their aims are.

Here’s what you can do, if you care enough. Please pass this on. (Ripped off from Pat Law from here on, since she has all the details.)

There will be an Extraordinary General Meeting (EOGM) come 2 May, Saturday, where all AWARE members will get a chance to vote. I won’t instigate for you to cast a no-confidence vote against the new administration but I’d like to urge for you to get that voice back together with all of us concerned citizens of this country. After all, we’ve lost our voice once. Let’ not lose it again.

Sign up today as an AWARE member in order to vote and drop me a comment at the end of this blog post with the message you want displayed on the wallpaper. Remember, every vote counts.

Details of the EOGM is as follow:

Date
2 May 2009, Saturday

Time
1400h – 1700h (do not be late else you might not get a chance to vote)

Venue
First Choice Auditorium
3 Lorong 6 Toa Payoh
#01-01 HSR Building
Singapore 319378

Other things to note:

1/ Only FEMALE members who are Singaporean & PRs above 18 years old are allowed to vote. However, men who are associate members are welcome to come and observe the proceedings.

2/ Sign up at www.aware.org.sg

3/ For those who signed up online and did not receive their membership card, please print out your confirmation email and receipt and bring it along for the EOGM.

4/ Join the Facebook group for more updates

Singaporeans for Procreating on Saturdays

24 Feb

Dear NMP Dr Loo Choon Yong,

You got it all wrong. In suggesting that our government introduce an extra day of work because we were evidently not making babies, despite the luxury of two whole days — TWO! Not one! Or half day! — to indulge in these baby-making duties, you forget one important thing.

There are people procreating everyday in our lovely island. It’s just that there are various reasons why the existence of two days’ conjugal possibilities do not result in an increase in the nation’s birthrate.

These reasons, I fear, you might not be able to hear without feeling shocked or awed.

Singaporeans like myself, much like the rest of the world, enjoy the idea (and the act) of sex without procreative intentions. The university you serve as a board member at, the one I attended for four years, openly sold condoms while banning the sale of cigarettes and alcohol, at the convenience stores onsite. I propose reversing the situation. Cigarette and alcohol consumption would lead to more procreating desires. We’re also worked very hard, and every SMU student is tremendously stressed at any point in the year, even two days into the start of the school term they are busy working. Then stealthily ban condoms. The school has a beautiful lawn and a abundance of erm, rooms, that students can freely rent (in exchange for points). City location. Bright students of SMU think differently. So they will think differently from the rest of the country this time and do what you want them to: procreate.

That would raise the fertility rate of our nation from 1.29 per woman to maybe 1.6, if every SMU student jumps in on it.

To then raise it to 2.1, I promise you form a national department. Let’s call it the Feedback Unit on Condom Kontrol (FUCK). This unit will strictly control condom distribution the way we only issue chewing gum at pharmacies, because rampant condom distribution is as big a threat on our economy as chewing gum on train doors is. It will have a sister unit, the Social Fertility Unit (SFU). It will plan activities for Saturday and Sunday, every weekend of the year, and it will have a graduate and non-graduate branch because, you know, we have different needs when it comes to sex. The Saturday and Sunday activities are aimed at a creating conducive atmosphere for couples (who are married, of course), to interact with each other and see each other in newly desirable light. Buffet lunches and excursions to romantic destinations together, such as to Mount Faber, helps to stir their procreative primal feelings and urges them to take cable car rides together, which then, of course, leads to babies for our nation.

Because we as Singaporeans love to listen to the mandate of our government, these initiatives will, I guarantee, bring the fertility rate to at least 1.8.

I’m afraid it might be difficult to reach 2.1, though. Go to Tanjong Pagar every Thursday, Friday and Saturday, and you’ll see why. It is full of Singaporeans like me. We love our country, and we do our very best to give your babies. In fact, I believe our procreative desires are manifested several times more than others’. That’s because Singaporeans like me quite enjoy the idea of the act of breeding although we possess no procreative talents. I try very hard, and the lack of talent was never a good reason to stop trying. But no baby comes out, and every month when my period come and I know I’ve failed, I am forlorn and upset. I don’t understand why I fail. My partner tells me we will keep trying. Even without contraceptives, the baby isn’t making itself. We procreate on most days, but Saturdays are our favourites, so I’m afraid to say I cannot rejoin the workforce on weekends — I have patriotic duties. I blame physiological reasons, not the choice of mates, and there are many like me on our happy shores. I’ve been told there is a disproportionate number of us in this country. That’s why Iv’e decided that even though I can’t help, in the tangible sense, I will show that I remember my country needs me. I am going to breed even more. And every Saturday, all of my pink brothers and sisters across the nation and out of it will do it at 9pm sharp (after dinner and after the CSI, but not before Facebook) in a synchronized act of attempted fertility. We call ourselves the SPS (Singaporeans for Procreating on Saturdays). I’ve even found a nice Chinese boy to be the father of my children, but there are existing legal issues you may need to tell Parliament to consider, on my plans for childbirth in a slightly different manner. I promise you I will give you 10 children when that happens, and thereby raise the nation’s fertility rate to an overwhelming 4.2, with my personal input.

But until that happens, every Saturday at 9pm I will give procreation my best shot. There was a time when people said that I wouldn’t make it, since I don’t have the natural resources required for that, but I might.

Reportage and Matrimony

22 Sep

I finally received my UAE residence visa. It’s got a bunch of Arabic, and then in English…

Profession: REPORT MAKER
Accompanied by
Wife: NONE

I immediately sent out an email asking somebody if she’d consider being the wife of a maker of reports. (Profession: The Report Maker’s Wife. Sounds like a bad war-time movie.)

The ever rude Mumbaikar suggested using liquid paper to delete the first ‘n’ from ‘none’, so it reads better:

Profession: REPORT MAKER
Accompanied by
Wife: ONE

So I’m working on it. The acquisition of the wife liquid paper. Perhaps the sheikhs will let me take four? (Or not.) This also means it’s time to go. I don’t really know what to feel about it except to make plans to turn 23 in my first days in a place I’ve never been to. Sounds alright to me.