Comments on: Tech Chick

By: Marc

Marc — Wed, 01 Nov 2006 06:34:19 +0000

True! That STOMP is a pathetic failure.

ST does not understand that blogging is a 2-way traffic.

Plus that bimbo looks so tabloid

By: cheery

cheery — Wed, 01 Nov 2006 01:53:50 +0000

Wahahaha…

This STOMP “chick” reminds me of those old karaoke videos. You know, girls with curry-pok hair and thick makeup run around the beach in 80s-style swimwear, and the music playing in the background is midi.

Please, popagandhi, you can do better

By: nAl

nAl — Tue, 31 Oct 2006 00:52:15 +0000

and food porn!!! Don’t forget the food porn!!!

By: Ashwin

Ashwin — Mon, 30 Oct 2006 23:08:49 +0000

if you need photography services, you know where to find me. :)

By: DK

DK — Mon, 30 Oct 2006 17:47:24 +0000

AAaahhh…. my eyes!!!!

By: Johnny Malkavian

Johnny Malkavian — Mon, 30 Oct 2006 16:03:16 +0000

How about some tech chick blogs that got it right?

Try TechieDiva or Pop Gadget.

By: Johnny Malkavian

Johnny Malkavian — Mon, 30 Oct 2006 16:01:54 +0000

Footer at Stomp.
“Best viewed at 1024×768 with IE 6.0 or Firefox 1.0 or above.”

Step 2’s got boobies, and step 6’s got thigh. Not sure what the model was talking about though. 8/

By: Hungry Turkey

Hungry Turkey — Mon, 30 Oct 2006 15:39:59 +0000

OMG. Replace chick with turkey please. This is why I’m moving out, far far away.

By: swissfondue

swissfondue — Mon, 30 Oct 2006 11:30:47 +0000

I’m betting a guy wrote the commentary on the “tech” tip. What girl would emphasise the word “screw”? The word is not even appropriate for the context (should be “plug in”.)

Please post a remake :)

By: Andre

Andre — Mon, 30 Oct 2006 09:52:34 +0000

Hell yeah. That STOMP thing sounds like a failure. I bet that “Tech Chic” doesn’t even know what she’s rambling about.

If you’d start your own “tech chick” feature, I’d think your site hits will shoot through the roof!

Cheers! Ã¯Â£Â¿